Feature Requests

Word for word dictation
Psychiatrist using dictation; word-for-word setting: I find that heidi is generating text far from my original dictation/meaning and not flagging its creative generation of text. EGs: 'seen with danielle smith, community nurse' became 'seen with Dr Daniel Smith'. 'N-H-I DABxxxx' became 'date of birth 200x/0x/0x', 'thought content; predominant themes of...' became 'thought content and thought form' (I didn't say 'thought form' in that sentence, never use the phrase 'thought content and thought form' as they are different concepts, and never use that phrasing in dictation as I use 'thought process' not 'thought form'). This isn't a template issue, it is the pretrained data it is referencing, and its level of confidence at generating a solution that is congruent to that, even in the face of ambiguity. The problem with this is that the generated text has correct syntax/spelling, and has the appearance of semantically coherence - but it not semantically correct. This leads to more effort in proofreading - as it doesn't stand out as an obvious error. I have 3 questions: Is it possible to change which pretrained data it is using - eg a generic english dataset, or 'professional document' dataset rather than a medical/psychiatric dataset. Is it possible to have a warning for ambiguous text generation - eg if the dictation seems ambiguous/atypical then some flag for that is used (eg a placeholder term, question mark, highlighting of the best guess, or several possibilities etc), rather than an unflagged relatively 'creative' generated solution. Is it possible to have stricter ambiguity thresholds beyond the 2 options of 'smart' or 'word-for-word'. eg really-really-strict word-for-word. Could the clinician change their language use? A comment about psychiatry: this might be a solution in simplistic checklist style psychiatric documents, which are common in managed care, production line type settings. In other settings, expertise and style of language use is fundamental part of the specialty. Expert psychiatrists do not want to adopt generic conventional language use. Changing my language use to average/conventional phrasing is not an option. I would resign before that happens.
2
·
Dictation
Load More