Heidi Evidence sources need to be up to date
under review
B
Ben Siddall
I just had a session on Heidi evidence and was recommended to perform an investigation based on a 2016 RACGP article. This evidence is now out of date and irrelevant, and suprising that it is used for Heidi Evidence recommendations. It would be great to be able to toggle evidence from last 5 years, or ideally from the last two years. I think Evidence is a great product, but unless I am certain the recommendations come from up to date evidence, I will always refer to current guidelines (eTG, AMH, HealthPathways, RCH).
Anya Sharma
marked this post as
under review