I wanted to suggest a possible feature that I think would help with consistency. I suppose the core idea is to have a system of customisable, persistent rules, inspired by the Rules feature in Cursor.

Cursor allows coders to create a text file containing global or context-specific instructions for the AI. These provide persistent context for each generation, ensuring the AI e.g. adheres to specific coding standards, uses certain libraries, or maintains a particular style. It's a good way to automate consistency.

Currently, you have to include writing styles/rules in each template, and update individual templates if wanting to make wider reaching changes. Heidi could use a similar system allowing clinicians to define a set of persistent rules that guide the AI's output across notes and documents. This is flexible The UI could be an evolution of the current 'Replacements' feature, with a similarly simple interface.

Here’s how it could be structured with multiple levels of control:

Examples:

Use UK English spelling. Maintain a formal tone.

Refer to our local Paediatrics service as 'The Children's Centre'.

Always use the phrase 'Attend A&E if...'.

Category-Specific Rules: Separate instructions for different document types, recognising that notes and letters have different requirements.